Badge - Rated by Super Lawyers Victor A. Rotolo
Badge - Million Dollar Advocates Forum
Badge - Multi Million Dollar Advocates Forums
Badge - New Jersey Supreme Court Certified Attorney
Badge - New Jersey's Best Lawyers For Families 2018
Badge - Rated by Super Lawyers
Badge - AV Preeminent Victor A. Rotolo
Badge - Client Champion Gold 2020
Badge - Hunterdon County Chamber of Commerce
Please click Award & Selection Criteria & Methodology for information regarding the specific criteria used for selection of each of the above awards.

DWI / DUI / Drunk Driving

DUI - The Aftermath | DWI - The Hidden Costs | Distracted Driving | Consequences of Underage Drinking | Social Host Responsibilities | DWI / DUI Frequently Asked Questions

A charge of ‘drunk driving’ - DWI (driving while intoxicated) or DUI (driving under the influence) - is considered to be a serious traffic violation in the State of New Jersey. In addition to DUI or DWI, the act of refusing to take a breathalyzer test (a test that measures alcohol content in your system) if requested by a law enforcement officer is also considered to be a major New Jersey traffic offense. As you probably realize, a conviction of DWI / DUI or the act of refusing a breathalyzer test carries penalties with lifelong implications that can negatively impact your career, reputation and many other aspects of your life.

Victor Rotolo successfully argues before the NJ Supreme Court in a case of constitutional import, in which the Court ruled that a DUI conviction cannot be used in any later DUI case for sentencing purposes if, (1) the individual plead or was found guilty, and (2) the individual was not advised of his/her right to counsel and, as to indigent individuals, the right to assigned counsel.

When faced with such a serious charge, you should seek qualified, experienced counsel. As a former prosecutor in Hunterdon County, Anthony Kearns is fully familiar with police practices as is Victor Rotolo, a former police officer in Elizabeth, NJ. The experienced gained, both from past roles and currently as attorneys, affords Messrs. Kearns and Rotolo a well-rounded perspective when representing clients facing charges for DWI or DUI.

Pursuant to New Jersey Law (Statute N.J.S.A. 39:4-50), a person may not operate a vehicle if the person is “under the influence of any intoxicating liquor, narcotic, hallucinogenic or habit producing drug.” If a person’s blood alcohol content (BAC) is at or above 0.08%, the person is considered intoxicated; according to the NJ Statute that person is not allowed to operate a motor vehicle. In addition to stipulating that a person ‘under the influence’ cannot operate a motor vehicle, the Law also prohibits a person from knowingly allowing another person under the influence to operate a motor vehicle as well.

The penalties for violating the New Jersey Laws regarding DWI or DUI are severe and include fines, community service, loss or suspension of a driver’s license, and jail time. The severity of the penalty is dependent on the number of times a person has been convicted of DWI or DUI.

The Burden of Proof is on the State

First the State must prove that the individual was intoxicated or under the influence of a drug. Per the New Jersey Law, this means the individual exhibited a "substantial deterioration or diminution of the mental faculties or physical capabilities" as a result of the use of drugs or alcohol.

When the State is unsuccessful in establishing intoxication through a breath test or through the blood, information from a field sobriety test administered by police officers may be introduced as evidence. Quite often these tests are subject to scrutiny because the field sobriety test may have been improperly administered and / or because the results are based on subjective interpretation.

In addition to the consumption of alcohol, a DUI summons may be based on the ingestion of illegal drugs. However, in order to present viable evidence to support the conviction of the use of illegal drugs, the State is required to present evidence gathered by a police officer that is certified in this area. Such police officers are certified as DRE, which is a Drug Recognition Expert. Results of urine or blood tests are also required to prove the person did have drugs present in his or her system.

Once it is determined that a person is under the influence of alcohol or drugs, the State of New Jersey is then obligated to prove that the person operated a motor vehicle in that condition. This requirement of ‘operation’ is generally established by actual observation by a police officer, but ‘operation’ of a motor vehicle can be established by circumstantial evidence as well. Furthermore, the State of New Jersey is not required to prove actual physical movement of the vehicle in order to meet the ‘operation’ criteria; it only has to prove that the individual intended to operate the vehicle and that the vehicle was capable of being operated. As examples, evidence such as a person sitting in a vehicle with the keys in the ignition or a person sitting in a ‘running’ vehicle even if the vehicle is not moving may be presented as possible proof to meet the State’s “intent” requirement for ‘operation’ of a vehicle.

There are numerous defenses to the charges of DWI or DUI in New Jersey. Messrs. Kearns and Rotolo and the attorneys at Kearns Rotolo Law have consistently provided their clients with a well-investigated and prepared defense to their situation and work to minimize the impact that such charges can have on one’s life. Please call Kearns Rotolo Law today if you are facing such serious charges.

What Our Clients are Saying

The absolute BEST!!! I have a family of attorneys but needed someone local. Victor was recommended to me and words cannot describe how pleased I was with his firm. The outstanding service and attention each member of his staff gave to me surpassed any and all expectations. Victor surrounds himself with a hardworking team that he leads. I felt it was money spent wisely. I will continue to recommend Victor and his associates.

- Stephanie

Mr. Rotolo has helped me numerous times in legal matters and has continued to support and help me through countless hardships. He is dedicated to providing the best service and is a true professional. I will continue to consult with him regarding any legal issues in the future. He is a respectable, hardworking, kind hearted man and I would recommend his legal services to anyone.

- Matthew

I am an attorney and have practiced law for 26 years. I hired Vic to handle a very difficult family matter because I do not handle family law. Vic was extremely competent and obtained a result far beyond my expectations. Without his counsel my son's and family's life would have been changed forever. Thank you Vic for your good lawyering. I very much appreciate the personal attention and time dedicated to this matter. I highly recommend Vic.

- Anthony

We recently had a situation where we needed to hire an attorney. We selected Kearns Rotolo Law and I can honestly say that we were above and beyond satisfied with Vic and his team. We would absolutely recommend this firm to anyone should the need arise. We blindly picked the firm out of the phone book because I liked his ad. Now I believe that God was pointing us in the right direction. Thank you Vic and Kearns Rotolo Law for being there for us in our time of need.

- Kim

Victor's expertise, due diligence, and empathy for his client made my first experience with the law (and last) a non-stressful one. Before the case, I did my research and looked over about 20 lawyers before choosing Victor. All my sources pointed to him as the best and they weren't off even a bit. Victor treated my case like it was his own and kept me up to date with all my appointments, breakthroughs in the case, and guided me step through step in a process that I never thought that I had to come to endure. If Victor's not available Susy will go out of her way to take care you. The productivity and efficiency in that office is second to none. Thank you Victor!

- Michael